Medicaid Audits | The Health Law Firm Blog

Physician Argues Definition of “Peer” at Formal Administrative Hearing

FACTS: The Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA”) is responsible for administering Florida’s Medicaid program and conducting investigations and audits of paid claims to ascertain if Medicaid providers have been overpaid. With regard to investigations of physicians, section 409.9131, Florida Statutes, provides that AHCA must have a “peer” evaluate Medicaid claims before the initiation of formal proceedings by AHCA to recover overpayments. Section 409.9131(2)(c) defines a “peer” as “a Florida licensed physician who is, to the maximum extent possible, of the same specialty or subspecialty, licensed under the same chapter, and in active practice.” Section “109.9131(2)(a) deems a physician to be in “active practice” if he or she has “regularly provided medical care and treatment to patients within the past two years.”

Alfred Murciano, M.D., treats patients who are hospitalized in Level III neonatal intensive care units and pediatric intensive care units in Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach County hospitals. His practice is limited to pediatric infectious disease. He has been certified by the American Board of Pediatrics in two areas: General Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases. AHCA initiated a review of Medicaid claims submitted by Dr. Murciano between September 1, 2008, and August 31, 2010, and referred those claims to Richard Keith O’Hern, M.D., for peer review. Dr. O’Hern practiced medicine for 37 years, and was engaged in a private general pediatric practice until he retired in December of 2012. During the course of his career, he was certified by the American Board of Pediatrics in General Pediatrics, completed a one-year infectious disease fellowship at the The University of Florida, and treated approximately 16,000 babies with infectious disease issues. However, he was never board certified in pediatric infectious diseases, and at the time he reviewed Dr. Murciano’s Medicaid claims, Dr. O’Hern would have been ineligible for board certification in pediatric infectious diseases. In addition, Dr. O’Hern would have been unable to treat Dr. Murciano’s hospitalized patients in Level III NICUs and PICUs.

After Dr. O’Hern’s review, AHCA issued a Final Agency Audit Report alleging Dr Murciano had been overpaid by $l,051.992.99, and that he was required to reimburse AHCA for the overpayment. In addition, AHCA stated it was seeking to impose a fine of $210,398.60.

OUTCOME: Dr. Murciano argued at the formal administrative hearing that Dr O’Hern was not a “peer” as that term is defined in section 409.9131(20)(c). The ALJ agreed and issued a Recommended Order on May 22, 2014, recommending that AHCA’s case be dismissed because it failed to satisfy a condition precedent to initiating formal proceedings. While recognizing that AHCA is not required to retain a reviewing physician with the exact credentials as the physician under review, the ALJ concluded Dr. O’Hern was not of the same specialty as Dr. Murciano.

On July 31, 2014, AHCA rendered a Partial Final Order rejecting the ALJ’s conclusion that Dr. O’Hern was not a “peer.” In the course of ruling that it has substantive jurisdiction over such conclusions and that its interpretation of section 409.9131(2)(c), Florida Statutes, is entitled to deference, AHCA stated that it interprets the statute “to mean that the peer must practice in the same area as Respondent, hold the same professional license as Respondent, and be in active practice like Respondent.” AHCA concluded that “Dr. O’Hern is indeed a ‘peer’ of Respondent under the Agency’s interpretation of Section 409.9131(2)(c), Florida Statutes, because he too has a Florida medical license, is a pediatrician and had an active practice at the time he reviewed Respondent’s records. That Dr. O’Hern did not hold the same certification as Respondent, or have a professional practice identical to Respondent in no way means he is not a ‘peer’ of Respondent.” AHCA’s rejection of the ALJ’s conclusion of law regarding Dr. O’Hern’s “peer” status caused AHCA to remand the case back to the ALJ to make the factual findings on the claimed overpayments that were not made in the Recommended Order because of the ALJ’s conclusion that Dr. O’Hern did not qualify as a “peer.”

On August 18, 2014, the ALJ issued an Order respectfully declining AHCA’s remand. AHCA then filed a Petition for writ of Mandamus in the First District Court of Appeal, asking the court to direct the ALA to accept the remand and to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law with regard to each overpayment claim. The court assigned case number 1D14-3836 to AHCA’s Petition, and the case is pending.
Source:

AHCA v. Alfred Murciano, M.D., DOAH Case No. 13-0795MPI (Recommended Order May 22, 2014), AHCA Rendition No. 14-687-FOF-MDO (Partial Final Order July 31, 2014)
About the Author: The forgoing case summary was prepared by and appeared in the DOAH case notes of the Administrative Law Section newsletter, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Dec. 2014), a publication of the Administrative Law Section of The Florida Bar.

By The Health Law Firm|2024-03-14T10:00:58-04:00June 1, 2018|Categories: Administrative law, Agency for Health Care Administration, Appeal, Health Care Industry, Medicaid, Medicaid audit, Medicaid Fraud, The Health Law Firm Blog|Tags: Administrative Hearing, administrative law, administrative law judge, Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA), AHCA appeal, AHCA petition, credentials, defense attorney, defense lawyer, final agency audit report, formal administrative hearing, formal hearing, health care attorney, health law, health law attorney, health law defense attorney, Medicaid Audits, Medicaid claims, Medicaid fraud, Medicaid overpayment, partial final order, pediatrician, pediatrics, peer, peer review|Comments Off

Medicare and Medicaid Audits of Psychologists and Other Mental Health Professionals – Part 1

By George F. Indest III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law

Over the past year I have observed an increasing number of Medicare and Medicaid audits being initiated against psychologists and other mental health professionals.

I have recently seen a number of audits initiated against psychologists and mental health professionals who treat assisted living facility (ALF) and skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents. Most often these are audits by the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC), because this area of medical practice has been identified as one fraught with fraud and abuse. Sometimes these are only “probe” audits, initial audits requesting one (1) to five (5) medical records. Other times the MAC has been requesting anywhere from 120 to 375 records.

This blog is the first part of my two-part series on Medicare and Medicaid audits initiated against psychologist and other mental health professionals.

Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPICs).

Zone Program Integrity Contracts (ZPICs), are the primary Medicare fraud detection contractors. If a probe audit, MAC audit or other investigation of audit suspected fraudulent billing, the ZPIC may come in. The ZPIC also identifies and target various CPT codes, areas of medical practice, services and equipment that are highly susceptible to fraud. It will then initiate a ZPIC audit on its own. ZPICs receive bonuses based on amounts they recover for the Medicare program.

OIG Annual Work Plan.

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) publishes a work plan each year which discusses the areas, types of medical services, CPT codes, equipment and tests it considers to be most susceptible to fraud and abuse. The new plan is usually published in the fall for the work year. It is available online.

Psychiatrists, psychologists and mental health counselors, as well as facility administrators, compliance officers, attorneys and billing and coding experts should review this work plan each year to learn what the OIG considers to be fraud and abuse and why. Measures should be immediately implemented to remedy any problems in your practice or facility that are identified.

Qui Tam or Whistle Blower Cases.

In many cases an audit or investigation may be convened against a facility, individual or group, based on the filing of a qui tam or whistle blower’s case. You won’t know this, however, because these cases are filed under seal and stay sealed, often for years. These suits are based on false claims that have been filed for Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, Veterans Administration (VA) or any other federal or state program. They are usually filed by disgruntled, former employees. These may cause the initiation of any of the types of audits discussed above.

If you suspect that this has happened, you should immediately retain legal counsel to represent you or your organization. If OIG special agents (S/As) or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents are involved, it would be foolish not to retain an experience health law attorney before you speak to anyone.

Medicaid Audits.

I have also seen an increase in Medicaid audits by state agencies, as well.

Ordinarily, Medicaid audits are initiated by the program integrity section or division of the state agency that administers the Medicaid program, or one of the agency’s contractors. The states are under increasing pressure from the federal government to be much more aggressive in identifying Medicaid fraud and recovering the overpayments.

If Medicare or any of its contractors recover an overpayment from a provider, they will also notify the state Medicaid program and Tricare program. These will them initiate audits and collection actions.

State ZPICs.

States are now contracting with ZPICs to help detect fraud and make recoveries of large overpayments from Medicaid providers. Additionally, the Medicare ZPICs may also detect and recover Medicaid overpayments, as well.

Future Blog on This Topic.

Check back next week, I will continue to share my insight into Medicare and Medicaid audits being initiated against psychologists and other mental health professionals.

Contact Health Law Attorneys Experienced in Handling Medicare and Medicaid Audits.

Medicaid fraud is a serious crime and is vigorously investigated by the state MFCU, the Agency for Healthcare Administration (AHCA), the Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPICs), the FBI, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Often other state and federal agencies, including the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), and other law enforcement agencies participate. Don’t wait until it’s too late. If you are concerned of any possible violations and would like a confidential consultation, contact a qualified health attorney familiar with medical billing and audits today. Often Medicaid fraud criminal charges arise out of routine Medicaid audits, probe audits, or patient complaints.

The Health Law Firm’s attorneys routinely represent physicians, medical groups, clinics, pharmacies, assisted living facilities (AFLs), home health care agencies, nursing homes, group homes and other healthcare providers in Medicaid and Medicare investigations, audits and recovery actions.

To contact The Health Law Firm please call (407) 331-6620 or (850) 439-1001 and visit our website at www.TheHealthLawFirm.com.

About the Author: George F. Indest III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M., is Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law. He is the President and Managing Partner of The Health Law Firm, which has a national practice. Its main office is in the Orlando, Florida, area. www.TheHealthLawFirm.com The Health Law Firm, 1101 Douglas Ave., Altamonte Springs, FL 32714, Phone: (407) 331-6620.

The Health Law Firm” is a registered fictitious business name of George F. Indest III, P.A. – The Health Law Firm, a Florida professional service corporation, since 1999.
Copyright © 1996-2012 The Health Law Firm. All rights reserved.

Medicare and Medicaid Audits of Psychologists and Other Mental Health Professionals – Part 2

By George F. Indest III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M., Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law

Over the past year I have observed an increasing number of Medicare and Medicaid audits being initiated against psychologists and other mental health professionals.

I have recently seen a number of audits initiated against psychologists and mental health professionals who treat assisted living facility (ALF) and skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents. Most often these are audits by the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC), because this area of medical practice has been identified as one fraught with fraud and abuse. Sometimes these are only “probe” audits, initial audits requesting one (1) to five (5) medical records. Other times the MAC has been requesting anywhere from 120 to 375 records.

This blog is party two in my series on Medicare and Medicaid audits initiated against psychologist and other mental health professionals. Click here to see part one.

Areas Being Targeted.

In state Medicaid audits, I have recently seen increased scrutiny in the following areas:

1. Pediatric care

2. Therapy (speech therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy) especially to pediatric patients and developmentally disabled patients.

3. Small assisted living facilities (ALFs), group homes, homes for the developmentally disabled (DD) and other small facilities.

4. Home health agencies.

5. Pediatric dentistry.

6. Optometry care, especially if delivered in a nursing home or assisted living facility (ALF).

7. Ambulance and medical transportation services, especially of nursing homes.

8. Psychiatric psychological and mental health.

Use of Statistical Sampling and Extrapolation Formulas to Multiply Repayment Amounts.

In both state Medicaid audits and in Medicare audits, I have experience increased reliance by the auditing agency on use of mathematical extrapolation formulas to estimate the amount that should be repaid. The formula used usually takes the overpayment that has actually been found and, based on several factors, multiplies it out to many times the actual overpayment amount. Thus, a found overpayment of $2,800 may become a demand for repayment of $280,000, based on the statistical extrapolation.

Things you should know about this are as follows.

1. Neither the Medicare program nor the state Medicaid programs should use an extrapolation formula, unless:

a. There is a “high” error rate in the claims that have been submitted; or

b. There have been prior educational efforts or prior audits of the provider, and the provider has failed to correct the problems in claims submission previously found.

2. The states each have different guidelines, rules or regulations on when they will apply the statistical formula. Some do not use it. Some use a higher percentage error rate to prompt use of the formula and some lower. North Carolina is one of the lowest we have encountered; an error rate of more than five percent (5%) will prompt its Medicaid agency to apply the statistical extrapolation to the recovery amount.

Problems Psychologists and Mental Health Professionals May Encounter Producing Records for Audits.

Many psychologists, therapists and health professionals are being audited because they are treating patients in a nursing facility or assisted living facility.

In most cases, a history, physical, comprehensive assessment, physician orders, diagnosis, medication list, medication administration records, consultations, social service notes and other medial documents being relied upon by the therapist are reviewed and assessed in connection with treatment of the patient. The big problem here is that these usually stay in the facility. When an audit occurs, these may not all be available.

The biggest issue that Medicare and Medicaid seem to be targeting is lack of documented “medical necessity.” The auditors take the position that the audited therapist must produce copies of the documents listed above, in part, to show “medical necessity” for the services provided.

Additionally, most physicians who treat patients in nursing facilities place their own assessments, plans and notes into the facility’s chart and do not retain a copy themselves. When the audit comes, they may not be able to produce copies of their own notes and evaluations.

I recommend that any provider treating residents of nursing homes and assisted living facilties (ALFs):

1. Review the local coverage decision (LCD) applicable to the code(s) you bill so you know what requirements must be met and what documentation is required.

2. Review the Medicaid provider handbook or state regulations for the services you provide if you are a Medicaid provider.

3. Obtain and keep copies of all applicable histories, physicals, care plans, physician orders, physician consults, etc. This is best done by obtaining and using a portable scanner. You can then keep the copies electronically in a properly secured, protected server in your office (backed-up, off site, of course).

4. Sign all of your evaluations, prepare your reports, evaluations progress notes and consultations on your laptop or other computer and sign it electronically before you print it out. Alternatively, if you still use paper, scan the paper copy (after signed) and maintain it electronically.

5. Do not use unusual or non-standard terms and abbreviations. If you do, you must keep an “abbreviations and definitions” list and produce it with your records in any audit response.

6. In your reports, evaluations and notes, use the terminology from the LCD and Medicaid provider handbook. Also, always include the start time, stop time and total time spent with any resident in your report, evaluation and notes.

7. Be sure the patient, patient’s next of kin/surrogate, patient’s physician or nursing home administrator signs off as having received the services each time. The patient’s signature is preferred.

Contact Health Law Attorneys Experienced in Handling Medicaid Audits.

Medicaid fraud is a serious crime and is vigorously investigated by the state MFCU, the Agency for Healthcare Administration (AHCA), the Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPICs), the FBI, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Often other state and federal agencies, including the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), and other law enforcement agencies participate. Don’t wait until it’s too late. If you are concerned of any possible violations and would like a confidential consultation, contact a qualified health attorney familiar with medical billing and audits today. Often Medicaid fraud criminal charges arise out of routine Medicaid audits, probe audits, or patient complaints.

The Health Law Firm’s attorneys routinely represent physicians, medical groups, clinics, pharmacies, assisted living facilities (AFLs), home health care agencies, nursing homes, group homes and other healthcare providers in Medicaid and Medicare investigations, audits and recovery actions.

To contact The Health Law Firm please call (407) 331-6620 or (850) 439-1001 and visit our website at www.TheHealthLawFirm.com.

About the Author: George F. Indest III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M., is Board Certified by The Florida Bar in Health Law. He is the President and Managing Partner of The Health Law Firm, which has a national practice. Its main office is in the Orlando, Florida, area. www.TheHealthLawFirm.com The Health Law Firm, 1101 Douglas Ave., Altamonte Springs, FL 32714, Phone: (407) 331-6620.

“The Health Law Firm” is a registered fictitious business name of George F. Indest III, P.A. – The Health Law Firm, a Florida professional service corporation, since 1999.
Copyright © 1996-2012 The Health Law Firm. All rights reserved.

By The Health Law Firm|2024-03-14T10:01:49-04:00May 15, 2018|Categories: Medicaid audit, Medicare Audit, Medicare Fraud, Mental Health Counselor, Mental Health Counselor Law, Psychology|Tags: assisted living facility (ALF), fraud prevention, mac, medicaid, Medicaid Audits, Medicaid fraud, medical groups, medical practices, medicare, Medicare Administrative Contractor, Medicare audits, Medicare fraud, mental health professionals, physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, review contractors, Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), Zone Program Integrity Contracts, zpic, zpic audit|Comments Off